
Communication that takes place among students and teachers could precipitate in the need for a much systematic and learning instrument enablement in-class or long after the school rings its bell. These instruments do not only focus on individual, but its advantageous in the long run is feasible and they could refer to the Information Communication Technology which assist the language learning environment as a whole. Basing on the above-mentioned reasons, it is anticipated that an upsurge mainstream of researches conducted in the sea of the fields exists, and the following researches from Blackwell Publishing Group, Ebscohost, and Language Learning & Technology Journal track these segments in which ICT and language learning are incorporated and interconnected.
How can ICT contribute to the learning of foreign languages by pupils with SEN
The first is an article from Blackwell Publishing Group published by Lynne Meiring and Nigel Norman entitled, ‘How can ICT contribute to the learning of foreign languages by pupils with SEN (Special Education Needs). The research seeks to analyse the initiatives by schools and teachers to cater for the needs of a wide range of pupils previously denied an experience of foreign languages. In addition, the article looks at the contribution of that one such facility, i.e. information and Communication Technology, can make towards removing the barriers to learning, especially when the talk center in inaccessible curricular area. Not only that, Meiring and Norman (2005) noted that the generic capability of ICT can enhance and enable learning of pupils with SEN.
Then Blamires (1999) drew a distinction between technology for enablement and the other for access. For some pupils in mainstream, ICT embraces their learning tool of enablement. He further declared that three froms of access; physical;cognitive and supportive exist. The Physical access is then divided into two; software and hardware. On the one hand, the software includes text to speech, talking websites, coordination and motor skills and writing support, multilingual spellchecker, dictionary and thesaurus, overlay keyboard, multimedia and reading support magnification. Whilst hardware encompasses fine motor skills, manual dexterity problems, physical impairment, switches and joysticks. Supportive access means hardware provide opportunities to support learning, especially with ‘drag and drop’. Third barrier is with regard to cognitive development. The use of ICT in support of language learning means a sharper concentration on learning. Hardy (2000) suggests that ICT has a fundamental role in developing thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills. In this, ICT helps to represent connections, seeing abstractions and connections in concrete physical terms. By using animated static illustrations on the same screen, the concepts of past and present tense can be made accessible by the power of visual impact to pupils who struggle with conceptual understanding. Then, skills of organization and categorization, thought webs and visual mapping, linking of foreign text and visual can be developed through software.
The use of ICT in language learning enablement to SEN is eight-pronged. First, with reference to speed and automation, a reading element could be supported through interactive listening (visuals or keyboard/mouse contact), additional graphics, the needs of the pupils are fulfilled with the print and background color through ‘drag and drop’. Further progression within this unit might involve pupils writing a short paragraph introducing themselves (name, age, etc.). the facilities of ICT, including pre-pared word-banks, drop-down menus, and writing frames, would significantly assist the pupil to complete the task within a reasonable timeframe. In terms of ICT capability, the outcome has significant presentational advantages that raise the self-esteem of the pupil, and the tasks make few demands on ICT skills.
Second, the use of ICT in enabling language learning to SEN is with regard to capacity and range. ICT has the capacity to broaden horizons by providing authenticity and realism. The internet, teacher-generated databases and multimedia CD-ROMs all contribute to creating a genuined and motivating platform for learning. Not only speed, automation, capacity and range support the learning, but also ICT can develop provisionality. The computer enables interaction on a one-to-one basis. It can enable pupils to experient in their learning and appreciate its changing and developing nature in all four skill areas, a simple matching activity can assist in the embedding of vocabulary, and can enable learners to work correspondences through constant trial and error. In writing, pupils can draft, redraft,use spelling and grammar checks.
A fourth use of ICT is the interactivity. The central feature of interaction with the computer is the immediacy of non-threatening feedback, and it is this aspect that is the primary focus of this section. In the case of pupils with SEN, it is important that the feedback is both non-threatening (lack of self confidence) and immediate (many present with only short-term recall). The computer provides non judgemental feedback, allowing one to choose for a response, gain immediate feedback and amend the response accordingly. In such a supported environment, the computer benefits the students by stimulating CD-ROMs facility, to stimulate real-life activity, allow interation to influence development and outcome of a series of events. The use of ICT means nothing without the involvement of authenticity. The ready availability of the computer and instant access to authentic materials and activities in the form of websites and emails benefit the students. The internet permits social development to extend beyond the confines of the classroom to a genuine communication and interaction with peers in classrooms abroad. Websites play a role in stimulating learning and curiosity in bringing topics.
A seventh use of ICT includes focusability. Search engines enable learners to develop referencing skills, while online dictionary with a search facility is user-friendly and the information retrieval is simpler and quicker. The incorporation of ICT in language learning also functions as multi-modality. The computer is able to generate multimedia learning experience in catering to specific learning styles and needs. Furthermore, the speed, ease and dynamism of the activity achieve a higher degree of motivation than that of the traditional media.
The Impact of CALL Instruction on Classroom Computer Use: A Foundation for Rethinking Technology in Teacher Education
This text written by Joy Egbert, Trena M. Paulus and Yoko Nakamichi examines how language teachers apply practical experiences from computer-assisted language learning (CALL) coursework to their teaching, apart from looking at the ways in which teachers continue their CALL professional development. The research explores; a) how teachers learn about CALL-based activities, b)how what they learned in their coursework impact their current teaching contexts, c) factors influencing whether they use computers in their classrooms, and d) how participants continue to acquire and master new ideas in CALL after formal coursework ends (professional development). The research hopes to help teacher educators better understand the impact of CALL coursework on classroom computer use and rethink ways to monitor pre- and in-service teachers’ continued development in the area of CALL. The participants surveyed included 20 English as a Second Language (ESL) and foreign language (FL) teachers who had taken the same graduate level CALL course (L530). They had completed either the Web-based or non-campus version of the course. Both the web-based and on-campus ran simultaneously, allowing the teachers in both versions participated in discussions together in an asynchronous Web forum. A set of item-questionnaire was administered and the instrument was pilot-tested with several students who had completed L530 and that revisions were made from the findings of the pilot test. While the six-page survey was mailed to all students who had completed the L530 course within the past years, nine of the participants volunteered to be contacted for follow up interviews through emails.
Data analysis was conducted based from the above-mentioned research questions. On learning about CALL activities, there was a focus on both professional and personal uses of technology. Email, reviewing software, developing computer-enhanced lessons, and using content-based software were the applications most frequently covered during the course. Most of the participants created personal/ or instructional Web pages. Several of the applications used state-of-the-art technologies, while others employed pedagogically strategies for using obsolete technologies. 25% to 89% of the participants had already participated in each of the activities prior to the course.
On the second question; CALL Coursework Transfer, the findings showed that 70% of the participants admitted that they currently use at least one CALL activity in their classroom. E-mail, developing lessons and creating instructional Web pages are the most frequently used call activities. Teachers also asked the students to use word-processing (61%), internet research (51%) and practicing drills (50%). Foreign language teachers in particular use CALL to connect their students with native speakers of the target language. In the findings on the second research question, it is revealed that teachers also need strategies and confidence-building practice in influencing students and that there is a call for coursework to more strongly emphasize a theory of technology integration. This finding reinforces more practical classroom management and good pedagogy in general and classroom-based teacher training.
The third question which was raised was with regard to factors influencing CALL use indicated 6 participants who did not use CALL activities cited lack of time, administrative or curricular restrictions and lack of resource. None of the participants remarked that it was due to a lack of confidence or interest. On the other hand, the fourth question addressed pertaining to professional development in CALL had the participants answered colleagues as the most commonly used resource for searching out about new tasks. The tasks included were expert consultation, fieldwork participation, or mentors work, and used Web resources to find similar activities. It is reflected that the need for more contextualized instruction directly related to the teaching environments in which language teachers will be practicing exists. Furthermore, teacher educators are hoped to help language teachers to understand and apply CALL activities to enhance student achievement. The interview also suggested that they used technology to take in current practice and beliefs. Implications for future research may include examining the usefulness of a sequence of CALL education courses and experiences, whether and what theories of learning with technology transfer from coursework to classroom. All in all, research in this field should continue to serve the needs of both language learning students, instructors and the role that effective technology and education can play in meeting those needs.
Recent Research in Language Learning Studies: Promises and Problems
The article attempts to address the following questions; a) why certain second language (L2) constructions learnable and others not, b) whether we can say that adult learners can take advantage of metalinguistic information about the language and negative input, c) whether focal attention is required for the acquisition in syntax and the phonological rules of a target language. The study of second language acquisition (SLA) which focuses on three categories; the language, context and learner, has placed greater emphasis on language for the past ten years, but less on the context and learner. Schachter, then, wishes to highlight significant developments in each of these three areas and suggests the directions on what future research can meet.
As to the first questions, Schwartz and Gubala-Ryzak (1992) have argued that only primary linguistic data can be utilized by the language module, which develops adult grammars as well as child grammars, negative evidence and explicit presentation of rules were not useable. Both the researchers would then, on Schachter’s point of view, are neutral on the question of the necessity of the attention, although this would be partially dealt with by the controlled input studies. On the second question, intact classroom studies with children immersed in foreign language appear to suggest that explicit presentation of structure and negative input do not offer much advantage in the long run. However, immersed adults, who do not have any effect on the presentation, are reasoned by the many conceptual and methodological problems that hinder controlled language studies. Not all learning leads to long term memory. On the final question (attention-to-form), Schmidt (1997) made strong comment that there was no learning of language without attention to form.
Personal View on Tracking Journal, Online databases and Papers at the Perpustakaan Tun Sri Lanang (PTSL)
The experiences of tracking online journal, databases and papers at the PTSL are two- pronged; commendable and unpleasant. On the one hand, the availability of the myriads of resources; Ebscohost, Proquest, Blackwell, Language and Technology to name a few, permits the users to be critical and neutral while choosing the most appropriate tool. As such, the online materials retrieved are of different perspectives, ranging from the old and up to the latest ones. Not only does the experience allows the users to be critical and neutral, but the environment supporting the research proves to be comfortable and in immaculate settings. The computer arrangements, allocation of adequate seats and the friendly library staffs sustain the motivation and interests of the writer to further enable journal-searching strategies and peer-to-peer light conversation.
However, the writer encounters a disappointment with regard to duration of online journal-downloading. The author wishes to point out that something be done to the speed of downloading, because the library serves hundreds of thousands of customers per day and in keeping their attractions to PTSL, the PTSL is recommended to upgrade the relevant settings, so that the PTSL is marketable on its own and that is able to stand on par with other libraries of top-ranked foreign universities. Not only that, parallel to the recent ranking supporting the achievements of the National University of Malaysia itself, the PTSL could be more critical in maintaining the decent impression of the university and strive to serve the customer better.
References
Blamires, M. 1999. Enabling Technology for Inclusion. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd. Egbert, J., Paulus, T. M. 2002.
The Impact of CALL Instruction on Classroom Computer Use: A Foundation For Rethinking Technology in Teacher Education. Language Learning and Technology. 6(3): 108-126. http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num3/egbert/default.html [22 March 2007]
Meiring, L. Norman, N. 2005. How Can ICT Contribute to the Learning of Foreign Languages by Pupils with SEN?. Support Learning. 20 (3):129-134. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/0023-8333.00059 [22 March 2007] Schachter, J. 1998.
Recent Research in Language Learning Studies: Promises and Problems. Language Learning. 48 (4): 557-583. http://web.ebscohost.com.ezplib.ukm.my/ehost/pdf?vid=6&hid=111&sid=5d5c68b5-5431-4b08-a553-20963dae4aeb%40sessionmgr2 [22 March 2007]
Schmidt, R. 1997. There is No Learning Without Attention. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Ann Arbor, MI. Schwartz, B. Gubala-Ryzak. 1992. Learnability and grammar reorganization in L2A: Against negative evidence causing the unlearning of verb movement. Second Language Research. 8: 1-38.